About this Event
04 Dec 2009 @ 12:45About the Event:
Christian Egenhofer, CEPS Senior Research Fellow, looked at whether EU Energy Policy is fit to address the modern security of supply challenge. He charted the Union's 50 year journey towards acceptance of the need for an EU energy policy but questioned whether the political will exists to follow through on the Hampton Court Consensus of 2005.
He analysed some of the key forces driving the Union towards a common energy policy such as the completion of the internal market; depeletion of indigenous sources of energy; climate change and energy’s increasing role in external policy.
He highlighted recent developments which point towards the emergence of a common energy policy. These are: the 3rd liberalisation package; EU energy/climate package; the Lisbon Treaty and increased EU competency in energy issues; the Second Strategic Energy Review, the Commission’s investment in energy infrastructure as part of the Economic Recovery Plan and recent regulation in the gas sector.
Under the Lisbon Treaty, security of supply remains the responsibility of EU Member States, but solidarity provisions have been introduced. Mr Egenhofer highlighted the following challenges which now face the EU namely agreement on security of supply risks, determining the EU’s added value on the issue and avoiding the issue of Moral Hazard once the EU takes on a greater responsibility for the energy security of Member States.
The slides from Mr Egenhofer’s presentation are available below.
Views: 692
| Video URL: | |
| Embed Code: |
Other Related
Associated Documents
Associated Publications
The Copenhagen Conference: How Should the EU Respond?
David Cameron's European Strategy - An Initial Assessment
Fishing for a Future: The Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy
Jobs, Growth and Reduced Energy Costs: Greenprint for a National Energy Efficiency Retrofit Programme
Lisbon: The Irish Guarantees Explained
This document is an easy-to-understand explanation of what the Lisbon Guarantees are and what they mean, politically and legally.

No comments